Skip to main content
Documentary backdrop image for Hot Coffee (2011)
85 minNot RateddocumentaryWorth an evening
7.2/ 10(66 ratings)• TMDB

Synopsis

$1,000,000 was spent on campaign ads to influence judicial elections in favor of tort reform, as detailed in this examination of the U.S. legal system.

Go deeper
Deep Dive

Why Watch

  • See how tort reform affects real people's lives.
  • Meet Stella Liebeck's family and hear their story.
  • Find out about the influence of money in judicial elections.

Did You Know

  • Stella Liebeck was awarded $2.86 million in the hot coffee case in 1994.
  • Nebraska's statutory cap on medical malpractice damages is $1.25 million.
  • Over $1 million was spent on campaign ads against Justice Oliver E. Diaz Jr.
  • Jamie Leigh Jones's case against Halliburton was tried in federal court in Houston.

Perfect For

Legal reform advocatesConsumer rights supportersThose interested in tort law
Read full Deep Dive →
Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants?

Liebeck was awarded $2.86 million in damages, but the judgment was later vacated.

What is the statutory cap on damages in Nebraska's medical malpractice cases?

Nebraska has a statutory cap of $1.25 million on damages in medical malpractice actions.

Who played a significant role in Jamie Leigh Jones' case against Halliburton?

Senator Al Franken worked closely with Jamie Leigh Jones to get her case heard in court.

Awards & Festivals

Comments

What are people saying?

Play More Like This

Browse more like this

Related Films

Is this your film?

If you made this film or hold the rights to it, we'd like to talk. We can license it and pay you a share of what it earns.